California Assembly Bill 233 would provide a tax deduction to California residents of qualifed costs paid or incuured for pet adoption. You must adopt from a qualified shelter or rescue (I do believe by “qualified rescue,” they mean licensed rescue), and it must occur during the taxable year, rather than prior. There have been differing reports on the internet, varying from the deduction from $100-300, but most reports cite $100. The proposed deduction will be available between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2015, if passed. The bill is sponsored by Assemblyman Cameron Smyth (R), and is cosponsored by the ASPCA.
Jurisdictions in California were among the first to have legislation fot mandatory spay or neuter, or at least much higher licensing fees for unaltered dogs. On a smaller scale. While it may not stop someone who is out to breed anyways, I saw similar programs come off as effective when people felt hit in the wallet. In some towns in Massachusetts, it is several times the costs to license an unspayed or unneutered dog than one who is. The average person who has no designs on breeding but just “didn’t get around” to doing it, is usually highly motivated. While the cost of the spay may be more than the difference in the licensing costs for one year, in the long run it will save them money year after year.
Just like other legislations have hit people in the wallet, this one very may reward people who rescue rather than buy, and may encourage people who don’t know much about it to at least entertain the idea of adoption. California has a very huge problem with good dogs being euthanized for crowding, just like other states. It is very shocking to learn that a very high percentage of dogs euthanized at Los Angeles city shelters are small lap dogs, who would be snapped up for adoption immediately in other places. In otherwords, a shelter dog is not how most people picture them.
It will definitely be interesting to see, if this passes successfully, if it will help slow down the euthanization rate in California, and act as a stopgap.
If you had a choice between buying a dog and adopting, would the tax deduction get you to at least consider rescue?

